The coming weeks are of vital importance for the European, and the world , economy. I was in Brussels last week and the sense of urgency was palpable. The French Prime Minister, Francois Fillon spoke of our being on the edge of a volcano that could blow up the EU, and our contract between the generations, unless it was capped.
As the European Commission said last Thursday we need to break the vicious triangle between doubts over
GETTING GOVERNMENT BORROWING UNDER CONTROL
As the European Commission said last Thursday we need to break the vicious triangle between doubts over
- The sustainability of debt of some countries
- The stability of the banking system and
- Growth prospects of developed countries
GETTING GOVERNMENT BORROWING UNDER CONTROL
The sustainability of Government debt depends on vigorous action to cut spending, and increase revenue. But this will take time. In the short run, the debts of some countries , including Ireland, will actually increase as a proportion of national income. This is because the gap that has opened up suddenly , between revenue and spending , cannot be closed overnight. This is Ireland’s case.
In the meantime, therefore, we take holding actions to restore confidence to potential purchasers of Government bonds.
One thing we should do quickly is introduce the permanent European Stability Mechanism. It could act more flexibly, and more quickly, than present arrangements to support Governments in difficulty which require consent by 17 national parliaments.
Pending that, the European Central Bank will have to continue to buy Government bonds.
Essentially, the official agencies need to be able to deploy such a huge volume of financial fire power that it will scare off speculators who might be tempted to short Government bonds of some countries, in the hope of making a quick profit.
Essentially, the official agencies need to be able to deploy such a huge volume of financial fire power that it will scare off speculators who might be tempted to short Government bonds of some countries, in the hope of making a quick profit.
In that sense, I believe the United States is giving good advice to the EU, and that Germany is being too hesitant.
We also need to work on a Euro Bond proposal, which I wrote about in a previous post on this site, although that does not provide a short term solution.
A credible plan to reduce debt levels in the public and private sectors in most EU countries is crucial. We should not think that “Austerity” is an optional policy choice. It is an arithmetic necessity.
A credible plan to reduce debt levels in the public and private sectors in most EU countries is crucial. We should not think that “Austerity” is an optional policy choice. It is an arithmetic necessity.
THE POLICIES OF THE ANTI AUSTERITY PROTESTERS WOULD BRING US BACK TO THE LIVING STANDARDS OF THE 1930s...ALMOST OVERNIGHT
The current protests about “austerity” do not put forward any credible policy alternative, that would not involve a far more dramatic, and more sudden, fall in living standards than anything current policies would entail.
A refusal to service existing debts, while maintaining current spending levels, would lead to an immediate drying up of Government funds. Cheques would bounce, and people would try to get their money out of the country. A return to the living standards, and autarkic economic policies, of the 1930s would quickly ensue. That is where the protesters ideas would lead us very quickly indeed.
It is striking that the media, which is giving generous coverage to these protests, is not subjecting the protesters ideas and proposals to any intellectual scrutiny at all. For example the protests led the news bulletin on Ireland’s national station, even though only 1000 people took part in the protests in Ireland .
EU MEASURES ARE FAR REACHING.....AND WITHOUT TRATY CHANGE
EU MEASURES ARE FAR REACHING.....AND WITHOUT TRATY CHANGE
Meanwhile far reaching measures to tackle our current problems are being agreed by the EU, which, if applied rigorously, and this is s a big IF, would gradually improve the competitiveness, and the public finances, of EU countries.
I believe the so called “six pack “ measures, recently agreed in the European Parliament, will be a lot more intrusive than most people think. They could mean, for example, that countries that fail to take action on unsustainable economic practices will be liable to EU fines. This plan will apply to much more than excessive Government borrowing. It could cover wage setting policies and unsustainable energy policies. If these measures can be implemented under the existing Treaties, I doubt if we will need any further Treaty change.
I believe the so called “six pack “ measures, recently agreed in the European Parliament, will be a lot more intrusive than most people think. They could mean, for example, that countries that fail to take action on unsustainable economic practices will be liable to EU fines. This plan will apply to much more than excessive Government borrowing. It could cover wage setting policies and unsustainable energy policies. If these measures can be implemented under the existing Treaties, I doubt if we will need any further Treaty change.
BUT ‘’TOO BIG TO FAIL’’ BANK PROBLEM IS BEING IGNORED
Restoring the credibility of the banking system will require more honesty than we have had up to now. Some countries, including Germany, have been unwilling to have their bank’s situation independently examined. The stress tests have been based on heroic assumptions, notably in respect of the repayability, in full, of all Greek debt.
None of the proposals currently being considered address what I consider to be the basic banking problem.
In the present artificial setup, some banks are too big too big, and too interconnected with other banks, to be allowed to fail.
This is because all banks in the EU have been allowed to borrow from ,and lend to, one another at wholesale level all across the EU, and some of them have got very big doing that, but, when they get into difficulty, they can only be rescued ,or wound up, at national level. Risk taking is at one level, but responsibility is at another. That has proven to be a recipe for disaster.
A bank that is free to borrow and lend with other banks all over Europe quickly can quickly grow too big for its home country to manage. That is what happened to Ireland’s banks.
I believe that it is now only possible to tackle the “too big to fail “problem at EU level, because too many banks have already grown far too big for their home counties .
But a bank that is too big to fail at national level would not necessarily be too big to fail at EU level. We need a real EU Single market for banking if we are to get control of the “too big to fail” problem.
I believe that it is now only possible to tackle the “too big to fail “problem at EU level, because too many banks have already grown far too big for their home counties .
But a bank that is too big to fail at national level would not necessarily be too big to fail at EU level. We need a real EU Single market for banking if we are to get control of the “too big to fail” problem.
To achieve that we should have
- An EU wide deposit guarantee scheme,
- An EU wide system of banking supervision, and
- An EU limit on the size of banks and on bank remuneration systems.
GIVING ECONOMIES MORE GROWTH POTENTIAL IS A SLOW BUSINESS
Getting growth prospects to improve is actually the most difficult of the three things we must do. This is because the things that Governments can do takes the longest times to deliver results. But it is very important. For example, the structure of the Italian economy is so creaky that it starts to have price inflation if it grows by more than 1%. Greece and Portugal have similar constraints.
The measures needed to put this right will deliver big returns in the long run, but are difficult politically, and sometimes slow to deliver results in the short run ie. before the next election.
Let me illustrate my point by referring to some the things the OECD recommended the Irish Government do to lift Ireland’s growth potential. The OECD said there should be
- A Further decline in labour costs. This may be possible to negotiate in the private sector, but difficult in the public sector because of the Croke Park deal. But the German example shows that reducing comparative labour costs does lead to big competitiveness gains over time. Germany is now getting the benefit of labour cost reductions it accepted ten years ago.
- Imposing Civil fines for breaches in competition law. This is essential ,but will take time to deliver results.
- Cutting legal and medical fees charged by the professions. Again very important, but will take time. It involves taking on groups that are very good at getting media attention. The resistance to hospital service reorganisation shows how medical interests can manipulate public opinion, even though they are intelligent people and know the country is in receivership.
- Reducing Long term unemployment benefit rates, the longer a person remains unemployed, and addressing disincentives to taking up work, caused by rent supplements. The present rates of payment are apparently such that Ireland has the highest “replacement rate” (80%) in the OECD. The replacement rate is a formula that compares the level of social welfare income, to wage income. The average OECD replacement rate is 60%
- Improving reading and maths standards in Irish schools, which have dramatically disimproved by comparison with other OECD countries, since 2000.
Apparently there are more teachers in Ireland in schools that have not been inspected in the last 5 years in Ireland than in ANY other OECD country!
TO GET LOWER INTEREST RATES TODAY, A COUNTRY MUST SHOW HOW IT WILL GROW FASTER TOMORROW
All these ideas make a lot of sense. Similar, and more far reaching ideas, have been put forward for other EU countries.
Implementing them now would not bring instant results. It will not lead to a quick short term spurt in economic growth.
But doing them now, would show the sort of political determination that would give lenders confidence that Ireland will grow faster in the longer term. The same sort of decision making is needed in France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus, Slovenia and Greece.
That would then encourage them to lend money now at reasonable rates to all these countries, including Ireland.
That is how all the three things, Government debt, banks and growth prospect are linked to one another. The vicious triangle must be turned into a benign triangle
That is how all the three things, Government debt, banks and growth prospect are linked to one another. The vicious triangle must be turned into a benign triangle
No comments:
Post a Comment